Nearshore water level modelling is not accuracy - D-Flow Flexible Mesh - Delft3D
intro story D-Flow FM
D-Flow Flexible MeshD-Flow Flexible Mesh (D-Flow FM) is the new software engine for hydrodynamical simulations on unstructured grids in 1D-2D-3D. Together with the familiar curvilinear meshes from Delft3D 4, the unstructured grid can consist of triangles, pentagons (etc.) and 1D channel networks, all in one single mesh. It combines proven technology from the hydrodynamic engines of Delft3D 4 and SOBEK 2 and adds flexible administration, resulting in:
An overview of the current developments can be found here. The D-Flow FM - team would be delighted if you would participate in discussions on the generation of meshes, the specification of boundary conditions, the running of computations, and all kinds of other relevant topics. Feel free to share your smart questions and/or brilliant solutions!
======================================================= | Sub groups
|
Message Boards
Nearshore water level modelling is not accuracy
BZ
Bing Zhao, modified 4 Years ago.
Nearshore water level modelling is not accuracy
Youngling Posts: 13 Join Date: 5/31/16 Recent Posts 00
Hi there,
Recently I modelled tide flow with DelftDahsboard and Delft3D. I make the open boudaries with Astronomic type which is generated by DelftDahsboard. I can get accuracy water level in the deep sea. But the nearshore water level is very bad compared with the tide station. It seems the shape is the same between the modelling and the tide station's water level, but the modelling water level is about 2 days later than the tide station's water level. Why? Please help me! I will attach the water level pictures. The black line is the tide station's water level, and the blue line is the modelling result.
Best regards,
Bing
Recently I modelled tide flow with DelftDahsboard and Delft3D. I make the open boudaries with Astronomic type which is generated by DelftDahsboard. I can get accuracy water level in the deep sea. But the nearshore water level is very bad compared with the tide station. It seems the shape is the same between the modelling and the tide station's water level, but the modelling water level is about 2 days later than the tide station's water level. Why? Please help me! I will attach the water level pictures. The black line is the tide station's water level, and the blue line is the modelling result.
Best regards,
Bing
Qinghua Ye, modified 4 Years ago.
RE: Nearshore water level modelling is not accuracy
Jedi Council Member Posts: 610 Join Date: 3/2/11 Recent Posts 00
Hi Zhao Bing,
I don't know if it is still a problem for you. But this is normal, for the offshore, the tidal long wave is less influenced by the nearshore processes. In the nearshore, the bed friction, wave-wave interaction, land scape all will change the wave shape of the tidal signal. This is all it is about, that we need models to reproduce this transformation.
Thus this is why you need Delft3D-like tools to do the study. Just for your information, Deltares also offeres individual service for model setup, model review etc. If you really need, pls contact them.
Greetings,
Qinghua
I don't know if it is still a problem for you. But this is normal, for the offshore, the tidal long wave is less influenced by the nearshore processes. In the nearshore, the bed friction, wave-wave interaction, land scape all will change the wave shape of the tidal signal. This is all it is about, that we need models to reproduce this transformation.
Thus this is why you need Delft3D-like tools to do the study. Just for your information, Deltares also offeres individual service for model setup, model review etc. If you really need, pls contact them.
Greetings,
Qinghua